Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 25 Next »

 

It's 2012 and virtualization technology is rampant in clouds and admins are choosing to use this option. As such,I did an investigation on the exact differences and check if there really are any performance gains.

I used these results to end up using "Install a minimal virtual machine" option and have been since Jan 2012 without any issues.

Lab

F4 on the first screen allows selection of,

  • Normal
  • Install a minimal system
  • Install a minimal virtual machine

According to the Ubuntu FAQ,

The virtual kernel only includes the necessary drivers to run inside popular virtualization technologies such as KVM, Xen, and VMWare. The server kernel in contrast contains the necessary drivers to work with a wide range of hardware, and should be installed directly on host systems. Other than that, all other options are identical between the server and the virtual kernel.

Note though, that it is still a minimal install so the "Basic Ubuntu server" task packages are missing.

So in theory, the minimal virtual machine option should be used if you are using virtualization technology. The gains would be a faster kernel without the bloat of consideration for many types of drivers. This is because the hardware list in virtual machines is much smaller.

Conceptually this is similar to the Stripped Solaris approach I refined from Tony Bates back in 2008. Since 2013 Google and others have taken this idea further (CoreOS, Ubuntu Snappy, Redhat Atomic) with the concept of core operating systems with the key benefits (again some borrowed from Solaris),

  1. Operating system upgrade supports transactional upgrade/rollback | Solari had this from way back.
  2. Traditional package managers replaced by new simplified systems (Snappy), or custom image builds (Atomic) | Yeah we did the same.
  3. Security enhanced through isolation.
  4. systemd for system/service management

Results

Here are the differences between a minimal virtual machine, minimal and normal all with ssh server during initial setup. The following commands were used,

free -h # how much memory used
ps aux | wc -l # how many processes (including the two to run this command)
df -h | grep root # how much disk used (not going to bother counting the small 30MB for boot
dpkg --get-selections | wc -1 # how many packages installed

Ubuntu 16.04.1

AttributeMinimal Virtual MachineMinimalNormalMicrosoft Azure Default Image
Packages236 (with open-ssh-client) 

430

[*] standard system utilities selected
no ssh

439
Memory on Initial Boot35 MB 80 MB97 MB
Tasks - 2 to run the commands

162 | 200

 223152
Disk Space733 MB 1.3 GB1.9 GB (need to double-check this on a fresh install)
Key Advantage

Reduced fat due to uniformity of virtual machines.

Minimal to run a normal Server.Already includes popular admin packages. 

Ubuntu 10.04.4

AttributeMinimal Virtual MachineMinimalNormalRecently Ubuntu Snappy 15.04Stripped Solari 10 (Just for Fun)
Packages2133133562 core packages containing minimal utilities 
Tasks848587174 
Memory on Initial Boot73,980k86,584k171,392k167,051 
Disk Space557M791M851M

639M

 
Key Advantage

Reduced fat due to uniformity of virtual machines.

Minimal to run a normal Server. Upgrade core OS as 1 package and revert btw OS upgrades quickly. Made for pure Cloud. 

References

Provided what the differences between the installs are - http://askubuntu.com/questions/57336/minimal-system-or-minimal-virtual-machine-on-install

  • No labels